“Against the Workshop”

Posted: July 9, 2013 in Reading, Teaching, Writing
Tags: , ,
Against the Workshop (2011)

Against the Workshop (2011)

What’s wrong with American letters? Ask Anis Shivani, and he’ll tell you in no uncertain terms: “Mediocre new writers, whose only talent seems to be to have understood the rules of the marketing game, are lauded week after week as brilliant”  while “[o]ld favorites mired in repetitive self-imitation are still offered as awesome masters” (15).  Variations on those lines from his  essay “Why is American Fiction in its Current Dismal State?,” appear throughout his book Against the Workshop, which brings together a decade of his essays and reviews.

Shivani offers convincing arguments, but some of his choices threaten his credibility. He chastens journals for “engag[ing] only in the mutual flattery business” (16) while his review of Jay Parini’s poetry and Parini’s introduction to the book present evidence of the same. Shivani calls Parini’s poetry “fiery hot to the touch, the apparent simplicity a form of high art” (134). Parini reciprocates–because Shivani’s pretty hot, too, it seems–writing of him as “one of the sanest voices in criticism today” a “keen vision” and “cruel wit” (xiv).

For Shivani, Billy Collins‘ poems are “single-mindedly predictable imaginative exercises” (61). But Shivani tends toward formula too, castigating in the same mode, repeatedly pinning the failings of fiction and poetry (in Best New American Voices, Best American Poetry, et al.) on an undemocratic system of graduate Creative Writing Programs rife with problems.

Shivani closes his book with an essay that likens Writing  Programs to medieval guilds.  It’s true; they have their masters, journeymen, and apprentices, but so do graduate programs in all other disciplines. The source of the problem isn’t Creative Writing, it’s the university credentialing system, itself. And that system now faces a challenge from MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). I wish that Anis Shivani would consider teaching one, or try working within the current  system to effect change.

Shivani, Anis. Against the Workshop: Provocations, Polemics, Controversies. Huntsville: Texas Review, 2011.

 

Advertisements
Comments
  1. Lenore Gay says:

    I agree that some grad programs, and especially some crit groups, can encourage sameness as well as mediocre talent. Yet how about the experience and the learning? Perhaps only 5% of MFA’s ever make it in the writing field. But the other students have become more literate and thoughtful. They can write a decent sentence. They buy novels, essays, poetry and young adult books. The MFA can give students and the community a lot.

    Lenore Gay

    • janemlucas says:

      Thanks, Lenore. You’re right. MFA workshops aren’t the only ones that promote formulaic and mediocre writing, but they’re Shivani’s bete noire. He claims that the graduates who secure book contracts are the wrong 5%, students who’ve learned the market, not the craft. So the others–the ones who don’t publish but who develop into “more literate and thoughtful readers,” as you write–are left to read second-rate work that’s praised as brilliant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s